Let's look at my writing from the very beginning of the year: the summer reading nonfiction rewrite. This is the first essay with an AP grade of 11 AP, albeit not the first essay written. This is a perfect reflection of the skills I gained from 10 Honors, as we had yet to learn or develop writing skills specific to the semester. I wrote on Quiet by Susan Cain, and the prompt was on how the author used specific devices to convey her purpose. I consider rhetorical analysis my worst skill and topic to write about, but this was not the lowest score I received throughout the year. I got a 6 (which is honestly pretty typical for me); my strength was a "good observation of [the] author's purpose and tone discussion," and my challenges were being "[un]specific with language analysis/devices" and "need[ing] to explain more." I quote this from the previous writing log, so it's my own writing. ...That sounds like me: having a good claim, but not having much explanation or development. (As you'll soon see, I write "good claim" or something similar in the "Strength" column of my writing log for practically all of them. Clearly, I don't know my own strengths.) At the beginning of the year, I often included extra information and I failed to expand my analysis. This was mostly due to me failing to truly comprehend the texts I was given, so I just gave "padding" on what I felt was a correct interpretation. It was good enough, but I needed to do better.
For the second full AP test, I turned in the rhetorical analysis. I felt it was my weakest out of the three and poorly written (before the rewrite). Unlike everything else, the strength I wrote here is slightly different: "clean analysis of excerpt." Well, it's not just the claim that's clear; the section that matters the most—the analysis—was clear. At this point in the year, I gained a lot more experience writing rhetorical analysis than at the start of the year. I read a lot of sample papers, and my mind was refreshed on particular strategies to use and ways to do rhetorical analysis (for example, tracing the argument). I got a 7 on this essay, which doesn't seem like much of an improvement. The fact that it was rhetorical analysis in and of itself, however, is already proof that something has improved. I was able to find stronger and more specific rhetorical devices, and I expanded my analysis to account for implications and deeper meaning. Of course, that was a result of reading the essays of other people and learning the skills in class.
I found it creative that even though your writing log doesn't necessarily project improvement, you know which aspects you've developed in. Your style is both intriguing and serious which I find interesting in itself. Also, although I hate to admit it, I have to agree that reading more books will help indefinitely with writing progression.
ReplyDeleteEven though you didn't observe a clear and obvious improvement from your weaknesses, it's great that you can better understand texts/passages and that you have established your own tone and style (something I still need to work on). Keep writing! Keep improving!
ReplyDelete